|
|
| News Link » /news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=20738 |  Willow (141) Aug 06, 2008 - 08:44 am » Edited on Aug 06, 2008 - 08:45 am
| Ya, just like they say about every album. The album has "The Unforgiven III" so it's guranteed to suck shit. "Reload" was supposed to be Metallica going back to oldschool after "Load", likewise "St. Anger" was yet another self admitted attempt to go back "oldschool", and we see how that worked out don't we?
Just because there's a few clips of "heavy riffs" doesn't mean jack.
There's some good articles in the press? No surprise there, considering Metallica's Legal Team put out a cease and desist orer on a blog that gave it a negative review after attending a listening party? Flag this | Edit this post |
| News Link » /news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=18422 | Willow (141) Nov 21, 2007 - 03:49 pm
| Not to knock anyone but this review is absolutely horrible. It's bland, non descriptive, and to tell you the truth, quiet generic. Let's not forget numerous grammar errors throughout the article (run on sentences "Visually Call of Duty 4 is a treat and while not quite as impressive as Crytek's efforts in Crysis Call of Duty 4's art design, character and weapons models and visual effects are first rate.").
Anyways, just my take on this review, I've become accustomed to seeing quality reviews on this site, and for a game that has been out over a week now, this review should be error free and more concise. Flag this | Edit this post |
|
